Asset class

Digital Assets

Cryptoassets and their derivatives — spot coins, perpetual futures and exchange-traded wrappers.

This marketWhat it is, what trades, and the ideas it runs on.

The market at a glance

Digital assets went from whitepaper (2008) to a multi-trillion-dollar asset class with spot ETFs, CME futures and institutional custody in fifteen years — the fastest financialisation in history. The core remains concentrated: Bitcoin and Ether carry most of the capitalisation; thousands of smaller tokens trade behind them with venture-style risk.

Structurally it is two markets in one: a crypto-native layer (24/7 global exchanges, perpetual futures, on-chain settlement, self-custody) and a TradFi layer (ETFs, CME, regulated custody) — increasingly arbitraged together by basis traders. Volatility remains the defining feature: 50–80% drawdowns are cyclical routine, and everything from position sizing to option pricing must start there.

Crypto's genuine financial invention

The perpetual future — an expiry-free future tethered to spot by a funding rate paid between longs and shorts every few hours — is the asset class's real contribution to financial engineering. Funding is simultaneously the price of leverage, the market's sentiment gauge, and a harvestable yield. The calculator below turns a funding print into annualised numbers — the arithmetic behind the "cash and carry" trade that anchors crypto's term structure.

Interactive: funding-rate carry calculatorMedium

Translate a perp funding rate into annualised yield — what a delta-neutral basis trade (long spot, short perp) would collect while the rate persists.

Simple APR
—
Compounded APY
—
Daily income on size
—

Funding flips sign and mean-reverts violently; annualised numbers assume persistence that rarely lasts. Exchange counterparty risk is the strategy's true price — FTX taught that lesson at scale.

How the products fit together

Spot is ownership — and custody is half the analysis. Perpetuals carry the leverage and price discovery. Options price the turbulence (with two-sided skew — melt-ups are real here). ETFs/ETPs import it all into brokerage accounts, and their flows have become the marginal price-setter for Bitcoin itself.

Concepts to master

  • Wrapper risk ≠ asset risk — most crypto disasters (Mt. Gox, FTX, GBTC's discount) were custody and wrapper failures, not Bitcoin failing.
  • On-chain data — a fundamentals dataset no other asset class has: flows, dormancy, exchange balances, all public. Learn to read it before trusting any narrative.
  • Correlation regimes — crypto trades like levered Nasdaq in macro risk-off, and like its own planet during crypto-specific events; position sizing must survive both regimes.
  • Fat tails as baseline — sizing, not conviction, is the professional's tool: small allocations capture diversification math while capping worst cases at the sleeve.

Interactive: leverage decay (volatility drag)Easy

Daily-rebalanced leverage — leveraged tokens, some perp strategies, leveraged ETPs — pays a hidden toll that scales with volatility squared. Crypto volatility makes it brutal.

Decay per day
—
Decay per year
—
100 becomes (flat market, 1y)
—
Annualised vol of position
—

Drag ≈ ½·L·(L−1)·σ² per rebalancing period — the cost of buying high and selling low every day to hold constant leverage. In a flat but choppy market, the position still bleeds.

The same questions, asked of all elevenThese sections answer the same thing on every asset class, so the answers can be read next to each other.

The units this market speaks in

  • Prices are per token and against something — usually a stablecoin rather than a bank dollar, which means the quote already contains a credit assumption most quotes do not. Stablecoin.
  • Perpetual futures are priced by a funding rate, quoted as a percentage paid every few hours between longs and shorts. It is the mechanism that tethers a contract with no expiry to spot, and it is the number that says who is crowded. Perpetual future.
  • Leverage is stated as a multiple and enforced mechanically. There is no phone call and no grace period: the liquidation engine acts, which makes forced selling faster here than anywhere else in finance.
  • Staking yield is quoted in percent, but it is paid in the same token whose price is the risk — a yield denominated in the thing you are exposed to is not the same as a cash yield. Staking and liquid staking.
  • Transaction cost is a fee paid in the chain's own token, varying with congestion rather than with the size of the trade. A small trade can be uneconomic at the wrong moment.
  • The venue is part of the price. The same asset trades at different prices in places with different withdrawal rules, and the difference is a measure of trust rather than of value. FTX, 2022.

Who is choosing, and who is forced

Forced selling in this market is faster than anywhere else in finance, because it is executed by software with no discretion and no telephone.

  • Forced, mechanically: leveraged positions at liquidation. There is no margin clerk and no grace period. The engine closes the position, which pushes the price, which triggers the next one — the cascade is a design feature of the venue, not an accident.
  • Forced, periodically: the funding rate. Crowded longs pay crowded shorts every few hours, so a one-sided market carries a running cost that eventually forces a decision. Perpetual future.
  • Forced by cost: miners and validators. Electricity and hardware are paid in ordinary money, so a share of production is sold regardless of price.
  • Forced by redemption: stablecoin issuers. Meeting redemptions means selling reserves, which links this market to short-dated government debt in a way most of its participants do not think about. Is a stablecoin stable.
  • Choosing: everybody else — and in a market this reflexive, the ability to do nothing is worth more than it is elsewhere.

What a bad day looks like here

  • The shape of it: a liquidation cascade. Prices fall, positions are closed by software, the closing pushes prices further, and the next tier of positions is closed. It completes in minutes rather than sessions.
  • The first tell: open interest rising while the funding rate is extreme. That is a crowded, levered, one-sided position waiting for an excuse.
  • The second tell: a stablecoin trading away from par. It usually means redemption has become slow or uncertain, not that the reserves are bad — but the market cannot tell those apart in the moment. Stablecoin.
  • The third tell: withdrawals slowing at a venue. In a market where the exchange is often also the custodian, this is the only warning that matters. FTX, 2022.
  • The question that would have caught it: who is holding the asset, and is that the same entity that is quoting me a price for it?

How a trade actually happens here

This is the only market on the site where settlement can be instant and final — and the only one where a settlement mistake cannot be reversed by anybody, because there is nobody holding the authority to reverse it.

  • On a centralised venue, the trade is a database entry. The venue holds both sides' assets and moves numbers between internal accounts. Execution is immediate, but nothing has settled in any external sense: the venue still owes you. Crypto spot.
  • Withdrawal is the real settlement, and it is a separate act. Everything a customer believes they hold on a venue is a claim on that venue until the assets are moved out of it. FTX, 2022 is what the difference turned out to be worth.
  • On chain, execution and settlement are the same transaction. Either both legs happen or neither does, with no clearing house in between — and finality arrives by degrees, becoming practically certain once enough blocks have been built on top.
  • The fee is paid whether or not it worked. A transaction that runs out of gas or reverts still costs, because the network did the work of finding out that it would fail.
  • Counterparty risk moves rather than disappearing. There is no dealer to fail, but there is a key to lose, a contract that may not do what its documentation says it does, and a bridge holding assets on one chain against tokens issued on another.
  • When it fails: an address is wrong by one character and the transaction succeeds. Nothing has broken, no rule was violated, and there is no mechanism anywhere to undo it.

Where the spread is, and who earns it

This is the most transparently priced class on the site and one of the most expensive to hold, because the costs are numerous, small, and charged in four different places by four different parties.

  • The venue's fee, split maker and taker. Published, tiered by volume, and charged on both sides of a round trip. Unusually for anything on this site, it is a genuine posted price.
  • The network fee, which is not the venue's. Moving the asset costs whatever the network is charging at that moment, and that is set by demand for block space rather than by anyone's price list. A withdrawal fee on top of it is the venue's.
  • Funding on a perpetual, paid several times a day. There is no expiry to pull the contract back to spot, so a periodic payment between longs and shorts does the job instead. Holding the popular side of a crowded position is a continuous outflow. Perpetual futures.
  • The spread between venues. The same asset trades at different prices in different places, and it stays that way because closing the gap means moving the asset or the cash, which takes time and carries its own risk. The gap is the price of that risk rather than a free lunch.
  • On a stablecoin, the reserves earn and the holder does not. The issuer holds short-term instruments against the coins and keeps what they yield. The holder's return is zero by design, which is the business model stated plainly. Stablecoins.
  • Staking commission, plus the lock-up. A share of the reward goes to whoever runs the infrastructure, and the asset cannot be moved during an exit queue whose length is a property of the network. Liquid staking.

How a position here ends

Every other class on this site ends through an intermediary who can be asked what happened. Several endings here are final in a way that has no equivalent anywhere else on the site.

  • You sell it on a venue — which requires the venue to exist, to be solvent, and to be processing withdrawals that day. Those are three separate conditions and 2022 separated them. November 2022.
  • You send it to the wrong address. There is no reversal, no recall, and nobody to telephone. It is the only market covered here where an operational error is arithmetically final.
  • The key is lost. Nothing failed, nothing defaulted, no price moved, and the position is gone. Custody here is possession rather than a record somebody else keeps.
  • Liquidation on a leveraged position. On a perpetual this is the ordinary ending rather than the exceptional one, and in a fast move the liquidation itself is what moves the price further.
  • The peg goes. A coin promising redemption at par stops being redeemable at par. Whether that is possible at all depends on what is actually held against it and whether anybody can compel its delivery — which is a documents question, not a market one.
  • The chain changes underneath it. A fork, a migration, a contract upgrade: the holding becomes two things, or one thing that no longer works with the software that used to read it.

Which risk decides across this class

Every product page here carries the same five bars. Read down the class instead of across one instrument, the question changes: is this a shelf of things that fail the same way, or a shelf of things that only share a department?

Which of the five decides what, across these 10

Counted from the same table each product page prints, so the two cannot disagree. Not a rating and not a ranking: it says which failure mode drives the outcome, not how dangerous anything is.

Operational decides 8 of the 10 — which is what makes this a class rather than a list: the instruments differ in shape and fail the same way. Credit decides exactly one of them, Stablecoin, which is the reason to read that page rather than assume it behaves like its neighbours.

The same five read across all 129 instruments →

Go deeper, and practiseLonger pieces, what an interview asks here, and a page to print.

Go deeper

Deep diveVolatility: crypto's defining constant

Bitcoin's annualised vol has lived between 40% and 100% — three to five times an equity index. That one number drives everything else here.

Rolling annualised volatility, stylised: bitcoin lives where equity indices only visit in crises.
BitcoinEquity indexTimeAnnualised volatility

Point at a line to read what it is doing.

How do I read this chart?

Time across, annualised volatility up, both series on the same axis. The comparison is the chart — a level that would be a crisis reading in one market is the ordinary state of the other.

Where this is explained properly:

The axes carry no scale on purpose. Every line here is a stylised shape drawn to show a mechanism, so there is no number to read off one — and any figure taken from it would be invented.

  • Consequences: smaller position sizes, faster-lethal leverage, expensive options, brutal volatility drag on leveraged products (calculator above).
  • Trend: each cycle's vol peaks lower — maturation and ETF flows — but the floor stays far above equities.
  • Imported frameworks must be re-derived: Sharpe ratios, 60/40 weights and "safe" leverage all break at this volatility.
Deep diveBoom and bust as an operating rhythm

Crypto's history is manias followed by 70–85% drawdowns — 2011, 2013–15, 2017–18, 2021–22 — each ending careers, each (so far) followed by higher highs.

Log-scale price path, stylised: repeated deep drawdowns around a rising trend — so far.
CryptoassetEquity indexTime (cycles)Price (log scale)

Point at a line to read what it is doing.

How do I read this chart?

Time across, price up on a log scale. The log scale is what makes repeated cycles comparable; on a linear one only the most recent would be visible at all.

Where this is explained properly:

The axes carry no scale on purpose. Every line here is a stylised shape drawn to show a mechanism, so there is no number to read off one — and any figure taken from it would be invented.

  • The trend question is the entire investment question — and nobody's chart answers it.
  • Each bust exposes the era's over-levered intermediary: Mt. Gox, Celsius, FTX — and pushes activity toward regulated venues and ETFs.
  • Budget for the base rate: a 75% drawdown mid-plan is history's norm here, not the worst case.
Deep diveCustody: not your keys, not your coins

Elsewhere custody is a footnote; in a bearer-asset world it's the main event — whoever holds the key is the owner, in practice.

  • Exchange custody: convenient, but you hold an IOU — FTX/Mt. Gox/Celsius clients became unsecured creditors; commingling was the crime, not a detail.
  • Qualified custodians: regulated trusts with segregation, insurance, cold storage — the institutional standard, used by the spot ETFs.
  • Self-custody: full sovereignty, full responsibility — no password reset; ~a fifth of all bitcoin is stranded in lost keys.
  • Institutional fixes: multi-sig and MPC key-splitting, proof-of-reserves, bankruptcy-remoteness language.
  • Practical rule: trading balances on venues, savings in cold storage, and never more on one venue than you can watch become a bankruptcy claim.
Deep diveMilestones: crypto's compressed history

Four boom-bust cycles in fifteen years — each with an infrastructure lesson:

  • 2008/09 — the Bitcoin whitepaper and genesis block: money without an issuer, as a working system.
  • 2010 — 10,000 BTC buys two pizzas: the first real-world price.
  • 2014 — Mt. Gox collapses with 850k BTC: custody becomes the industry's defining problem.
  • 2015 — Ethereum launches: programmable contracts, and later the entire DeFi stack.
  • 2017 — ICO mania; futures list; the first institutional toe-dip.
  • 2020 — DeFi summer: lending, AMMs and stablecoins find product-market fit.
  • 2022 — the great deleveraging: Terra, Celsius, FTX — leverage and commingling, punished in sequence.
  • 2023 — USDC's SVB weekend: even "safe" stablecoins are redemption machines.
  • 2024–25 — spot ETFs, MiCA and the GENIUS Act: the regulated era begins in earnest.

Interactive: impermanent lossMedium

Providing liquidity to a 50/50 automated market maker means selling the winner as it rises. The cost versus simply holding has a name — and a formula.

Impermanent loss
—
HODL value (from 100)
—
LP value (before fees)
—
Fees needed to break even
—

IL = 2√r/(1+r) − 1 for a constant-product pool. A 2× move costs ~5.7% versus holding; a 4× move ~20%. Trading fees are the compensation — whether they cover it is the entire LP business decision.

Deep diveWho runs this market
  • Exchanges: Binance, Coinbase, OKX and Bybit dominate global volume; the CME offers regulated, cash-settled futures for institutions that cannot face offshore venues.
  • Custodians: Coinbase Custody, BitGo, Anchorage and Fidelity Digital Assets hold institutional coins — the segregation that FTX's clients discovered they did not have.
  • Stablecoin issuers: Tether and Circle, whose reserve portfolios make them collectively a significant holder of short-term US government debt.
  • ETF issuers: BlackRock, Fidelity and peers, whose spot products became the regulated on-ramp after 2024.
  • Protocol and infrastructure layers: validator operators, staking providers like Lido, and oracle networks such as Chainlink that feed off-chain prices to on-chain contracts.
  • Regulators: MiCA now governs the EU; the SEC and CFTC continue to divide US jurisdiction by litigation; the FCA supervises the UK. Rules here change faster than in any other asset class.
  • Where the data lives: public blockchains themselves — every transaction is auditable through block explorers and analytics firms, a transparency traditional markets never offered.
Deep diveNumbers & conventions worth memorising
ItemConvention
Bitcoin supplyCapped at 21 million; issuance halves roughly every four years — the cycle much of the market trades around
Block timesRoughly ten minutes for Bitcoin, about twelve seconds for Ethereum; finality is probabilistic, not instant
Perp fundingExchanged every eight hours on most venues — an "0.01%" rate is roughly 11% annualised
Trading hoursContinuous: no close, no weekend, no circuit breakers on most venues
VolatilityTypically 40–80% annualised for major coins — three to five times a broad equity index
Staking yieldLow single digits on Ethereum, falling as more coins are staked; paid in the volatile asset itself
SettlementOn-chain and final within minutes — no counterparty, no recall, no reversal if you send it to the wrong address

The asymmetry to internalise before sizing anything here: the settlement finality that makes this technology useful also makes every mistake permanent. There is no support desk behind a private key.

How this market works

DriversWhat moves prices here

What actually moves a price here on an ordinary day, and where to look for each one. Ordered roughly by how often it is the answer — not by how interesting it is.

DriverWhich way it pushesWhat to watch
Liquidity and market depthThin books make every other force largerThe same order that moves nothing in a deep market moves this one several per cent.
Leverage in the systemLiquidation cascades are the dominant short-term mechanismForced closing of levered positions produces most of the violent moves, and it feeds on itself.
Regulatory decisionsA single ruling can change what may be held, and by whomAccess, not opinion, is frequently what moves the price.
Protocol and supply mechanicsIssuance schedules are written in code and publicWhatever else is uncertain here, the supply schedule is not — which makes it the one thing that cannot surprise anybody.
Stablecoin plumbingIt is the funding market of this asset classWhen the settlement asset is doubted, everything priced against it moves at once.
Correlation with risk appetiteHigher than the story suggestsThe independence claimed for this asset class is least present in the sessions where it would matter.
CalendarThe calendar this market keeps

Every market has a rhythm its regulars plan around and a newcomer discovers by being surprised. These are structural — they recur because of how the market is built, not because of anything happening this year.

WhenWhat happensWhy it matters
ContinuousThere is no closeThe market trades through weekends and holidays, so a shock arrives when no other market can respond.
Protocol-scheduledIssuance changes and upgradesDates known years in advance, which is unusual and means they are priced long before they arrive.
PeriodicFunding-rate resets on perpetual contractsA recurring payment between longs and shorts that reveals which side is crowded.
On the rulingRegulatory and legal decisionsNot a schedule so much as a docket, and the largest single-day moves cluster around it.
Month endOptions expiryConcentrated open interest on a monthly cycle, as in any options market.
ConnectionsHow this market reaches the rest of the atlas

No asset class is a room with the door shut. A move here shows up there, through something specific — and knowing the route is most of knowing why a market you do not follow just moved the one you do.

  • Money Markets — Stablecoins are money-market funds in a different wrapper, and hold much the same paper.
  • Cash Equities — Listed miners, exchanges and treasuries turn this exposure into a share, with leverage attached.
  • Equity Derivatives — The same options mechanics, on an underlying with several times the volatility.
  • Foreign Exchange — A dollar-denominated settlement asset that trades around the clock is, in practice, a currency market.

Analysis

AnalysisThe analyst's checklist
  1. What is the claim? A network's native coin, a redeemable liability, a share of fees, or nothing at all — the four cases price differently.
  2. Who holds the keys? Custody is the first question here, not an operational footnote.
  3. Venue risk: exchange solvency, segregation, proof-of-reserves — and what your claim would be in an insolvency.
  4. Supply schedule and concentration: issuance, unlock cliffs, and how much sits in a handful of wallets.
  5. Leverage in the system — perpetual funding rates and open interest are the market's public margin gauge.
  6. Where does this sit in my jurisdiction's rules? The regulatory perimeter here moves faster than in any other asset class.
AnalysisRed flags
  • Yield with no named source — if nobody can say who pays it and why, you are the source.
  • Balances on an exchange described as holdings: that is an unsecured claim, as three bankruptcies have now demonstrated.
  • Token unlock cliffs scheduled shortly after a listing — the supply is public information; read it before buying.
  • Funding rates at extremes: crowded leverage precedes liquidation cascades with tedious reliability.
  • Bridges and wrapped assets — each wrapper adds a trust assumption most holders never examine.
  • Anything requiring you to lock funds for a long period in exchange for a high advertised return.

Staking yield, honestly measured

A staking reward paid in the same token that is being issued to everyone is not straightforwardly income. The real yield is what remains after the network's own issuance dilutes you:

$$ r_{\text{real}} = \frac{1 + r_{\text{gross}}(1-\text{commission})}{1 + \text{issuance}} - 1 $$
What the symbols mean
  • rthe interest rate, per year

Interactive: staking yield after commission, issuance and priceEasy

Net of commission
—
Dilution from issuance
—
Real yield in tokens
—
Total in fiat terms
—
Reading
—
Health warning
—

Set the price change to −30% — an ordinary quarter in this asset class — and the entire yield discussion becomes irrelevant. That is the honest hierarchy: price dominates, dilution matters, the advertised percentage is the smallest term. See liquid staking.

Market mapWho is on the other side of your trade

Prices are made by participants with different jobs, different constraints and different reasons to trade. Knowing whose need you are meeting explains more about a market than any indicator.

  • Market makers supply liquidity across dozens of venues with no consolidated tape, which is why prices diverge and why arbitrage is a business rather than a footnote.
  • Perpetual futures traders dominate volume. Funding rates are therefore the clearest positioning signal available in any market — see the funding tool.
  • Miners and validators are structural sellers with fixed costs, and their selling is mechanical rather than discretionary.
  • Stablecoin issuers have become large holders of short-dated government debt, which quietly links this market to the money markets.
  • Institutional allocators arrived through regulated wrappers, bringing custody standards that the 2022 failures made non-negotiable.
Costly mistakesThe five mistakes that cost the most here

Not a list of ways to be clever — a list of the errors that recur, why each one is structural rather than careless, and which tool on this site settles it.

  • Leaving assets on an exchange. A balance on an exchange is an unsecured claim on that company. That sentence is the entire lesson of 2022.
  • Holding a leveraged token for more than a day. Daily rebalancing plus volatility is a mathematical drag — the decay calculator quantifies it.
  • Treating a stablecoin as cash. It is a private liability backed by reserves you have not audited, and it has traded well below par.
  • Reading a yield without asking where it comes from. If the source is not identifiable, the yield is someone else's principal — see staking for what a real one looks like.
  • Sizing by conviction rather than volatility. At 60% annualised volatility, a position sized like an equity holding behaves like a leveraged one.

What an interview asks here

Digital asset questions test whether you can describe the mechanism precisely and stay neutral about it — which is harder than it sounds and is the actual test.

Try each one out loud before you open it. What is underneath is the shape of a complete answer, not a script — somebody who can produce those parts in their own words can also answer the four variations that follow, and somebody who has memorised a paragraph can answer one.

Q1What makes a settlement on a public blockchain different?

What it is checking. The one genuine structural difference, and it should be stated without enthusiasm.

A complete answer contains:

  • Settlement is final on the ledger itself, with no intermediary who can reverse it.
  • There is no central counterparty, so there is no novation and no mutualised default fund.
  • Which means an error — a wrong address, a lost key — has no recourse, unlike an incorrect payment instruction in a bank system.
  • It also means settlement finality is probabilistic in some designs rather than legal, which is a different concept from finality in a payment system.
  • So it removes counterparty risk and adds operational risk, and which is worse depends entirely on the user.

Read it properly: Digital assets · Clearing and settlement

Q2What actually backs a stablecoin?

What it is checking. A question where the honest answer is 'it depends, and that is the point'.

A complete answer contains:

  • Some hold reserves in cash and short-dated government debt, and the question is what exactly, audited by whom, and redeemable by whom.
  • Some hold other crypto assets over-collateralised, so the peg depends on liquidation working during a fall.
  • Some held nothing but an algorithm and a second token, which is the design that failed completely in 2022.
  • So the reserve composition, the redemption right and who has it are the three things to establish before anything else.
  • A redemption right that only large counterparties hold is a different product from one everybody holds.

Read it properly: Is a stablecoin stable · Terra, 2022

Q3What is impermanent loss?

What it is checking. A mechanism question with a precise arithmetic answer.

A complete answer contains:

  • A liquidity provider in an automated market maker holds a changing mix of two assets as their relative price moves.
  • The pool rebalances mechanically, selling the one that rises and buying the one that falls.
  • So the provider ends with less of the winner than simply holding both would have given — that gap is the loss.
  • It is called impermanent because it reverses if the price returns, and it is permanent the moment liquidity is withdrawn.
  • Fees earned are what compensate for it, so the question is always whether they exceeded it.

Read it properly: The impermanent loss calculator · Liquidity pool

Q4Why did an exchange failure in 2022 look like a bank failure?

What it is checking. A structure question, and the answer is about custody rather than about technology.

A complete answer contains:

  • Customer assets were not segregated from the operating business, so a claim on the exchange was unsecured rather than a claim on property.
  • There was no capital requirement, no supervised balance sheet, and no auditor of the kind a regulated intermediary has.
  • So the failure mode was the classic one: assets used elsewhere, a run when that became known, and no lender of last resort.
  • None of that is a blockchain question — the ledger worked exactly as designed.
  • Which is the general lesson: the risk was in the intermediary, not in the instrument.

Read it properly: FTX, 2022 · Investor protection

Q5What is staking, economically?

What it is checking. Whether the candidate separates a yield from a return.

A complete answer contains:

  • Locking tokens to help validate a network, in exchange for newly issued tokens and fees.
  • The reward is largely paid in the same token, so it is partly dilution of everybody rather than income from outside.
  • Net of the issuance rate, the real yield is much lower than the headline, and can be negative.
  • There is also lock-up and slashing risk, and, through an intermediary, the counterparty risk of that intermediary.
  • So the honest calculation is gross reward, minus commission, minus issuance, converted at whatever the token does.

Read it properly: The staking calculator · Liquid staking

Q6Why does a leveraged token or ETP decay?

What it is checking. A compounding question that applies well beyond this asset class.

A complete answer contains:

  • It targets a multiple of the daily return, so it rebalances its exposure every day.
  • That means it compounds the sequence of returns rather than the total, and volatility costs money in a flat market.
  • The effect is worse the higher the multiple and the higher the volatility, and it is unavoidable rather than a fee.
  • Over a long horizon a flat-but-volatile underlying produces a large loss in the product.
  • So it is a short-horizon trading instrument by construction, which is a statement about design rather than about quality.

Read it properly: Why leveraged products decay · The decay calculator

Q7How would you explain this asset class to a sceptical risk committee?

What it is checking. A communication question, and the answer that works is neutral and specific.

A complete answer contains:

  • Separate the technology from the assets: a settlement mechanism and a set of speculative instruments are different subjects.
  • State what is genuinely new — final settlement without an intermediary — and what is not: volatility, leverage and custody failures are old.
  • Be precise about custody, because that is where nearly every loss has actually happened.
  • Be precise about the regulatory position in the relevant jurisdiction, which differs sharply and is changing.
  • And say plainly what you do not know, because a risk committee is testing your calibration rather than your enthusiasm.

Read it properly: Digital assets · Explaining it out loud

Do these against a clock — one at a time, ninety seconds each, answer before you look.

Whose questions these are. Every question on this page was written for this publication. None is taken from anybody else’s question bank, and none is a claim about what any named firm asks — that is neither verifiable from here nor ours to assert. They are our own reading of which mechanism a question of this kind is testing. Information and education only.

Test yourself: five questions

Five quick questions on this asset class — checked entirely on your device, nothing stored or sent. Wrong answers come with explanations; the deep dives above hold every answer. For education only.

The whole class on one printable page

Who pays whom, drawn

The payoff charts on this site say what an instrument is worth at the end. These say who the parties are and what each one hands over — every payment between the investor and the bank on the other side, in the order it happens. Each diagram sits on its product's own page. 4 of them carry a second diagram, folded shut, for what happens after the bargain is struck — clearing, delivery, custody. That half is deliberately separate: a clearing house is not a party to the bargain.

  • Crypto Spot — What you pay a venue, and what you are holding afterwards
  • Crypto ETP / ETF — What the wrapper costs, and what it does not change
  • Stablecoin — Who may actually redeem, and against what
  • CBDC — Central bank money, handed out by ordinary banks
  • NFT — What the token actually points at
  • Staking & Liquid Staking — What you earn, what is deducted, and what the exit costs
  • Tokenised Treasury — The yield, and the three parties standing between you and it
  • Perpetual Future — The funding rate, paid between traders

The Digital Assets product shelf

Easy. DigitalBitcoin · Ether · Cryptoassets

Crypto Spot

Bearer assets on public ledgers — a new asset class still arguing about what it is.

Easy. DigitalSpot Bitcoin ETF · Crypto ETN

Crypto ETP / ETF

Crypto without the keys: bitcoin and ether wrapped into ordinary brokerage-account securities.

Easy. DigitalUSDT · USDC · Fiat-backed token · Digital dollar

Stablecoin

A dollar that settles like crypto: the token that pegs itself to fiat and quietly became the plumbing of the entire digital-asset market.

Easy. DigitalCentral bank digital currency · Digital euro · Digital pound

CBDC

Central bank money in digital form, held directly by the public. Not a cryptoasset in any meaningful sense — and potentially the largest change to bank funding in a century.

Easy. DigitalNon-fungible token · Digital collectible

NFT

A unique token recording ownership of a pointer. A genuine technical primitive, a completed speculative cycle, and the clearest recent lesson in what a claim actually consists of.

Medium. DigitalstETH · LSD / LST · Staked ETH · Restaking (frontier)

Staking & Liquid Staking

Earning the blockchain's own interest rate — and the token that made locked collateral liquid, basis risk included.

Medium. DigitalTokenised money market fund · On-chain T-bill · RWA token

Tokenised Treasury

A government bond fund with a blockchain wrapper. The yield comes from the bills; the token contributes settlement speed and a new set of failure points.

Medium. DigitalAMM LP · Automated market maker position · LP token

Liquidity Pool Position

Deposit two assets, earn a share of the trading fees, and discover that your position quietly rebalances into whichever one is losing.

Hard. DigitalPerp · Perpetual swap

Perpetual Future

Crypto's native derivative: a future that never expires, tethered to spot by a funding rate.

Hard. DigitalBTC options · ETH options

Crypto Option

Calls and puts on bitcoin and ether — vanilla mechanics, triple-digit volatility.

Concepts, comparisons and case studies about digital assets

  • EasyFTX, 2022Case StudiesNot a market accident: customer assets that were supposed to sit in custody were spent, and a run revealed there was…
  • EasyLeverageConceptsBorrowed money does not change what an asset earns
  • EasyThe Arithmetic of DrawdownsAnalysisLosses and gains are not symmetric, and the asymmetry compounds
  • MediumIs a stablecoin actually stable?QuestionsIt is stable exactly as long as everyone believes it can be swapped back for a dollar
  • MediumTerra, 2022Case StudiesA coin held at a dollar by an arbitrage against a second coin it could print
  • MediumVolatilityConceptsFinance's stand-in for risk: measured from the past, traded in the present, feared about the future — and an asset…
  • MediumVolmageddon, 2018Case StudiesA trade that had paid steadily for years ended in a single afternoon — because the products were designed to buy…
  • MediumWhich Desk Trades WhatPrepEleven trading seats and six that sit next to them: what each one actually touches, the single number it lives by,…

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer