Stablecoin

Also known as: USDT, USDC, Fiat-backed token, Digital dollar

A dollar that settles like crypto: the token that pegs itself to fiat and quietly became the plumbing of the entire digital-asset market.

5 min read · 912 words · Updated

1 · SnapshotThe one idea to remember
Key intuition: a stablecoin is a banknote reinvented — a bearer claim on an issuer, circulating peer-to-peer, whose entire value rests on the belief that redemption at par is always available. Money-market economics, crypto distribution.
2 · BeginnerWhat is it, really?

A stablecoin is a crypto token built to be worth exactly one dollar — or one euro — at all times. It travels the way Bitcoin does: anywhere in the world in minutes, at any hour, with no bank in the middle. What it is built not to have is Bitcoin's price chart.

The main design is very simple. For every token out there, the issuer holds one real dollar — mostly in short-term US government bills — and promises to swap any token back for that dollar on demand. Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC) do this on an enormous scale. Between them they account for most of the tokens outstanding, which makes stablecoin issuers together one of the larger holders of US government debt — more of it than most countries hold.

Why would anyone want a dollar in this form? Traders need one: almost every crypto trade has cash on one side, and most Bitcoin changes hands against USDT rather than actual dollars. Savers in Argentina, Turkey or Nigeria use them to hold dollars their own banks cannot offer them. And sending money abroad this way takes minutes and costs cents, against an industry that charges a percentage.

Who may actually redeem, and against what
Youa holderThe issuerThe reservesbills and depositsDirect partnersmay redeem at par4Usually no direct claim1Dollars, from a vetted party2The money is invested3You buy on a market5The peg is only as good as theassets

a paymentsomething deliveredonly if a condition is metnot a payment

The peg is a promise by an issuer, backed by reserves you do not hold and usually redeemable only by parties who are not you.

How coins come into being

  1. Direct partners → The issuer Only approved counterparties deal with the issuer directly.
  2. The issuer → The reserves Typically in short-term government paper and bank deposits — which is where the issuer's own risk lives.

How you get one

  1. You → Direct partners From an exchange or another holder, at whatever price it trades at — which is near one dollar, not one dollar by law.

If you want dollars back

  1. You → The issuer Most holders cannot redeem with the issuer at all and must sell on a market instead. The peg then depends on somebody else's arbitrage.

If the reserves are impaired

  1. The reserves → You A stablecoin briefly traded well below a dollar in March 2023 because part of its reserve sat at a bank that had just failed.
Asset class
Digital assets (payment/settlement)
Instrument type
Token redeemable (or not) for fiat at par
Traded
24/7 on-chain and on every crypto exchange
Typical users
Traders (settlement leg), emerging-market savers, DeFi

Which risks decide the outcome

Not how risky this is, and not a rating — there is deliberately no total. It says which of five failure modes drives what happens here, in the same order on all 129 products so they can be compared. This publication's own reading; see the notice below.

  • Marketmatters
  • Creditdecides it
  • Liquiditymatters
  • Fundingbarely applies
  • Operationaldecides it

What decides it here. The peg is a promise by an issuer, backed by reserves you do not hold and usually redeemable only by parties who are not you.

What the five mean, and which one decides where →

3 · IntermediateHow it works in practice

The three architectures

  • Fiat-backed (USDT, USDC): off-chain reserves of T-bills, repo and cash; the token is an IOU on the issuer. Simple, dominant — and dependent on reserve quality and honest attestation.
  • Crypto-collateralised (DAI/USDS): on-chain vaults over-collateralised with volatile assets. Transparency by construction, at the cost of capital efficiency:
$$ \mathrm{CR} = \frac{\text{Collateral value}}{\text{Stablecoin debt}} \;\gg\; 1 \quad (\text{typically } 1.5\text{–}3), \qquad \mathrm{CR} < \mathrm{CR}_{\min} \Rightarrow \text{forced liquidation} $$
  • Algorithmic: no collateral — the peg maintained by an arbitrage loop against a sister token. Terra's UST proved the design reflexive: in May 2022 the loop ran in reverse and the token, its sister coin and the ecosystem built on them collapsed together within days. The category is, deservedly, near-extinct.

How the peg actually holds

Not by decree — by arbitrage. Authorised participants can mint at $1.00 and redeem at $1.00 with the issuer. Token trades at $1.002 on an exchange → mint and sell; trades at $0.997 → buy and redeem. The peg is as tight as this loop is fast and open:

$$ P_{\text{secondary}} \in \big[\,1 - c_{\text{redeem}},\; 1 + c_{\text{mint}}\,\big] $$
What the symbols mean
  • Pa price, or a present value
  • cthe coupon rate

where the costs \(c\) include fees, minimums, KYC friction and — decisively — redemption confidence. Widen redemption doubt and the band widens with it.

Worked example — a peg stress-tested: March 2023, Circle discloses $3.3bn of USDC reserves stuck at the failing Silicon Valley Bank (~8% of reserves). Redemptions are bank-hours-only over a weekend; the arbitrage loop is severed; USDC trades to $0.88. Monday, US authorities guarantee SVB deposits — the loop reopens and USDC snaps back to $1.00 within hours. The token depegged not because reserves were bad, but because redemption was temporarily unavailable: the peg is the redemption channel.
4 · AdvancedPricing & valuation

Money-market economics in a token wrapper

A fiat-backed stablecoin is structurally a constant-NAV money market fund that keeps the yield: reserves earn ~5% in bills at 2023–24 rates while tokens pay 0%, making float the business model — the largest issuers have reported profits that would flatter a mid-sized bank, on a headcount smaller than one of its branches. The seigniorage invites competition: yield-passing rivals, tokenised MMFs (BlackRock's BUIDL), and exchanges demanding revenue shares. Regulation pushes the other way — the US GENIUS Act (2025) and EU's MiCA both prohibit paying interest on payment stablecoins, fencing them off from deposits and funds, and mandate HQLA-style reserves, redemption at par, and (MiCA) volume caps for non-euro coins.

Run dynamics and reserve design

The 2008 money-fund playbook maps one-to-one: par claim, first-mover advantage, opaque assets. Differences that matter:

  • 24/7 secondary vs. banking-hours primary: the token trades continuously but redemption settles through banks — every stress episode (USDT May 2022: $10bn redeemed in days; USDC/SVB) is an interaction between these two clocks.
  • Reserve composition history is the credit story: Tether once held ~50% commercial paper and an undisclosed loan book; post-2021 settlements with US authorities pushed it to overwhelmingly T-bills — reserve attestations (not full audits, still) became the market's key disclosure document.
  • On-chain observability cuts both ways: DAI's collateral is verifiable block by block; but on-chain runs are also frictionless — no queue at the branch, just a swap.

Macro footprint

  • Bill-market demand: stablecoin float is now a policy-relevant buyer of short Treasuries; BIS work shows measurable flow effects on bill yields from large mint/redeem waves.
  • Dollarisation channel: USDT is de facto retail dollar infrastructure across the global south — extending dollar dominance through channels no US agency controls, a fact both US strategy papers and emerging-market capital-control regimes have noticed.
  • Settlement collateral: perpetual futures margin, DeFi collateral, and increasingly conventional cross-border B2B payments all clear in stablecoins — the "cash leg" of a parallel settlement system that runs alongside the conventional one.

The formulas above are standard textbook formulations, simplified for teaching. They explain the mechanism — they are not a valuation tool, and they will not reproduce a dealer’s price.

5 · Desk notesHow practitioners think about it
Practitioner note: analyse a stablecoin as three separable risks — reserve credit (what backs it), redemption mechanics (who may redeem, when, at what friction), and venue liquidity (how far secondary can drift while primary is shut). Every historical depeg is a failure of the second or third, priced by markets as if it were the first.

Now say it back

Close the page and give Stablecoin in four sentences. It takes a minute and it is the only way to find out whether reading it was enough.

  1. Who wants what — two parties wanted opposite things badly enough to write it down.
  2. What the contract obliges, and when — not the payoff; the obligation.
  3. Where the money comes from — name the source, or you have described a hope.
  4. What makes it lose — the ordinary way, not the dramatic one.

Do it with a clock → · why these four

Put Stablecoin beside any other instrument →

Where this instrument shows up elsewhere

  • EasyExplain It Out LoudPrepA four-sentence template that fits every instrument on this site, twelve products written out in it, and a drill for…
  • MediumTerra, 2022Case StudiesA coin held at a dollar by an arbitrage against a second coin it could print
  • MediumWhich Desk Trades WhatPrepEleven trading seats and six that sit next to them: what each one actually touches, the single number it lives by,…

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer