Contingent Convertible Bond

Also known as: CoCo, AT1, Additional Tier 1, Hybrid capital

A bank bond with a self-destruct clause: it pays like debt until the bank stumbles — then it becomes equity, or nothing.

5 min read · 871 words · Updated

1 · SnapshotThe one idea to remember
Key intuition: a CoCo is a bond that volunteers to be the airbag. You collect a premium every year for agreeing, in advance, to be the first bondholder sacrificed — while the bank is still a going concern.
2 · BeginnerWhat is it, really?

After 2008, taxpayers bailed out banks because their bonds couldn't legally absorb losses while the bank was still alive. Regulators' answer: force banks to issue bonds that turn into loss-absorbing capital automatically, before failure. The contingent convertible — CoCo, formally Additional Tier 1 (AT1) — is that instrument.

In good times a CoCo behaves like a high-yield bond from an investment-grade bank: coupons of 6–10%, far above the same bank's senior debt. The premium exists because of what's written in the small print. If the bank's capital ratio falls through a trigger, the bond either converts into shares or is simply written down — possibly to zero. No default, no court, no vote: the contract executes itself.

Two more traps justify the fat coupon: the bank may cancel coupons at its discretion without defaulting, and the bond is perpetual — it never has to be repaid, only may be repaid at call dates.

The bond that can stop being a debt
The investorThe issuing bankThe supervisorcan pull the trigger1The issue proceeds2A high coupon,discretionary4Written to zero, or turnedinto shares3The trigger is reached

a paymentonly if a condition is metnot a payment

Every other bond on this site is repaid or defaulted on. This one has a third ending, written into the terms and triggered by a ratio.

While all is well

  1. The investor → The issuing bank A high coupon compensates for what follows. It is the market's price for a low-probability total loss, not a generous yield on a safe asset.
  2. The issuing bank → The investor The bank may cancel it without defaulting, and a cancelled coupon does not accumulate.

If the capital ratio falls

  1. The supervisor → The issuing bank A stated capital ratio or a supervisory judgement of non-viability. Neither is in the investor's control and neither needs a bankruptcy.

What then happens

  1. The issuing bank → The investor Which of the two depends on the documentation, and the two are not priced alike. In March 2023 a write-down structure paid nothing while shareholders below it received stock.
Asset class
Fixed income (bank capital)
Instrument type
Perpetual subordinated bond with loss-absorption trigger
Traded
OTC, min. denomination €/$ 200k
Typical users
Credit hedge funds, asset managers, private banks

Which risks decide the outcome

Not how risky this is, and not a rating — there is deliberately no total. It says which of five failure modes drives what happens here, in the same order on all 129 products so they can be compared. This publication's own reading; see the notice below.

  • Marketdecides it
  • Creditdecides it
  • Liquiditymatters
  • Fundingbarely applies
  • Operationalmatters

What decides it here. A capital ratio you do not control, measured by a supervisor you cannot appeal to, can cancel the coupon or write the whole thing to zero while shareholders below you keep something.

What the five mean, and which one decides where →

3 · IntermediateHow it works in practice

The contractual machinery

The trigger is mechanical, set on the bank's common equity ratio:

$$ \text{Trigger:}\quad \mathrm{CET1\ ratio} = \frac{\text{Common equity tier 1}}{\text{Risk-weighted assets}} \;\le\; 5.125\% \;\text{(low)}\ \text{or}\ 7\% \;\text{(high)} $$

On breach, one of two loss-absorption mechanisms fires, fixed at issuance:

  • Equity conversion: bond converts to shares at a preset or floored price — holders are diluted shareholders of a troubled bank.
  • Write-down: principal is written off, permanently or (rarely, in theory) with a possibility of write-up. Most Swiss and many EU CoCos chose this harsher variant.

Beyond the mechanical trigger sits the PONV clause — "point of non-viability": the regulator can impose loss absorption whenever it judges the bank non-viable, regardless of the reported ratio. This discretionary trigger, not the CET1 formula, is the one that has actually fired.

Structure of a typical AT1

  • Perpetual, callable from year 5–10 and regularly thereafter; if not called, the coupon resets to the prevailing swap rate plus the original issue spread.
  • Fully discretionary coupons, blocked automatically if the bank breaches its capital-distribution thresholds (MDA) — coupons compete with dividends and bonuses for the same payout capacity.
  • Deeply subordinated: below Tier 2, above only common equity — in theory.
Worked example — the theory's stress test: in March 2023 Swiss authorities wrote CHF 16bn of Credit Suisse AT1s to zero via the PONV/viability route, while shareholders received UBS stock worth ~CHF 3bn. Bondholders ranked behind equity in outcome — legal under the Swiss prospectuses, shocking to the market, and an entire asset class repriced overnight around documentation risk.
4 · AdvancedPricing & valuation

Valuation: yield-to-call, extension risk and the reset

An AT1 quotes as a portfolio of scenarios: called at the next date, or extended perpetual at the reset spread. The market convention prices to worst:

$$ P = \min_{\,c \,\in\, \text{calls}} \; \mathrm{PV}\big(\text{coupons to } c + \text{par at } c\big), \qquad \text{coupon after call}_i = \text{swap}_{5y} + s_{\text{reset}} $$
What the symbols mean
  • Pa price, or a present value
  • cthe coupon rate
  • ythe yield to maturity

Extension risk dominates the rates leg: when credit spreads blow out past the reset spread \(s_{\text{reset}}\), calling and refinancing costs the bank more than extending — so precisely when markets sour, expected maturity lurches from 1–2 years to perpetual and duration extends violently (the 2023 repricing added years of spread duration to the index in a week). Banks nonetheless usually call, paying up to protect refinancing goodwill — Santander's 2019 non-call, the first by a major issuer, cost holders points and the issuer little.

Modelling the loss absorption

Structural models treat the trigger as a barrier on the (unobservable) capital ratio: the CoCo is a bond short a down-and-in claim on bank equity — a knock-in written on an accounting number that management itself reports, with a regulatory option (PONV) layered on top. Practical consequences:

  • Accounting barrier ≠ market barrier: CET1 ratios move slowly and are managed; market-based distance-to-trigger (equity price, sub-debt spreads) leads reported ratios by quarters. Credit Suisse's last reported CET1 was 14.1% — nearly triple its trigger — the week it died.
  • Death-spiral debate: conversion CoCos with floored conversion prices can incentivise equity shorting as the trigger nears; write-down CoCos avoid dilution mechanics but destroy the creditor hierarchy instead.
  • Coupon-cancellation option: an MDA breach stops coupons with no cure — modelled as a series of digital options on the capital-buffer path; the 2016 Deutsche Bank scare traded this leg alone, with AT1s dropping 10+ points on coupon fear without any trigger risk repricing.

After Credit Suisse

The EU and UK regulators publicly re-committed to equity absorbing losses first in their jurisdictions — re-anchoring the hierarchy contractually broken in Switzerland — and the market reopened within months, at wider spreads and with investors finally reading the prospectus section titled "Risk of write-down". Documentation basis (Swiss-style permanent write-down vs. EU conversion) now prices explicitly.

The formulas above are standard textbook formulations, simplified for teaching. They explain the mechanism — they are not a valuation tool, and they will not reproduce a dealer’s price.

5 · Desk notesHow practitioners think about it
Practitioner note: an AT1 is three shorts in one — short a regulatory option (PONV), short a management option (coupons), short a refinancing option (extension) — funded by one long coupon stream. Price the documentation, not the issuer's investment-grade rating: the rating describes the bank, none of the three shorts.

Now say it back

Close the page and give Contingent Convertible Bond in four sentences. It takes a minute and it is the only way to find out whether reading it was enough.

  1. Who wants what — two parties wanted opposite things badly enough to write it down.
  2. What the contract obliges, and when — not the payoff; the obligation.
  3. Where the money comes from — name the source, or you have described a hope.
  4. What makes it lose — the ordinary way, not the dramatic one.

Do it with a clock → · why these four

Put Contingent Convertible Bond beside any other instrument →

Where this instrument shows up elsewhere

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer