Basis Swap

Also known as: Float-for-float swap, Cross-currency basis (cousin), 3s6s (historic)

Floating against floating: the swap that trades the small print between two interest rates everyone assumed were the same.

5 min read · 833 words · Updated

1 · SnapshotThe one idea to remember
Key intuition: a basis swap prices the assumption everyone else makes silently — that two ways of measuring "the" interest rate are interchangeable. In calm times the spread is background noise; in stress it becomes the loudest signal in the market.
2 · BeginnerWhat is it, really?

An interest rate swap exchanges fixed for floating. A basis swap exchanges floating for floating — two different reference rates on the same currency and notional, say a rate that resets every month against one that resets every three months, with a small spread on one leg to balance the deal.

Why would anyone trade the difference between two floating rates? Because the differences are real money at scale. Different reset frequencies carry different bank-credit and liquidity content; a bank whose assets earn one index while its funding pays another has basis risk on its entire balance sheet — and the basis swap is the tool that hedges it. The spread is quoted in single basis points, and the notionals run to trillions.

The concept's most famous stress test: before 2008 the spread between 3-month interbank rates and overnight-indexed rates was ~5bp and treated as a curiosity. In the crisis it hit 365bp. "Floating is floating" stopped being true in one week, and an entire re-plumbing of finance — the multi-curve revolution, eventually the death of LIBOR — followed from that chart.

Floating against floating
Party Apays index oneParty Bpays index two1A spread is agreed, not arate2One floating index on thenotional3The other index, plus thespread4A funding mismatch isclosed

a paymentnot a payment

Neither leg is fixed, so what is being traded is the relationship between two indices rather than the level of rates.

At the start

  1. Party A → Party B One leg carries a spread so that the two streams start out worth the same. That spread is the price of the whole trade.

Every period

  1. Party A → Party B For example a term rate, reset at the start of the period.
  2. Party B → Party A For example an overnight rate compounded over the same period. The difference is netted into a single payment.

netted into a single payment

Why anybody does this

  1. Party A → Party B A bank lending against one index and funding itself at another is exposed to the gap between them, and this is the instrument that removes it. In a cross-currency version the two legs are in different currencies and principal is exchanged as well.
Asset class
Rates derivatives
Instrument type
Swap exchanging two floating indices
Traded
OTC, cleared; quoted as a spread in basis points
Typical users
Bank treasuries, swap desks, cross-currency funders

Which risks decide the outcome

Not how risky this is, and not a rating — there is deliberately no total. It says which of five failure modes drives what happens here, in the same order on all 129 products so they can be compared. This publication's own reading; see the notice below.

  • Marketdecides it
  • Creditbarely applies
  • Liquiditybarely applies
  • Fundingdecides it
  • Operationalmatters

What decides it here. Neither leg is fixed, so what is traded is the relationship between two indices — a spread that can move much further than either rate.

What the five mean, and which one decides where →

3 · IntermediateHow it works in practice

The contract

Both legs float; one carries the quoted spread \(b\):

$$ \text{A pays: } \mathrm{Index}_1 + b \qquad \text{A receives: } \mathrm{Index}_2 \qquad \text{same notional, same currency} $$

Classic single-currency pairs: 1-month vs 3-month tenor basis (in the LIBOR era, "1s3s", "3s6s"), IBOR vs overnight (the LIBOR-OIS basis), and today's survivors — term-rate vs compounded overnight, and jurisdictional pairs like Euribor vs €STR, whose basis still embeds bank credit content the way LIBOR-OIS did.

The cross-currency cousin — where basis got famous

The cross-currency swap should, by covered interest parity, price flat. It doesn't: the cross-currency basis — most-watched in EUR/USD and USD/JPY — is the premium non-US banks pay for dollars through the swap market. It goes structurally negative when dollar demand outruns dollar supply:

$$ \text{EUR/USD basis} = -30\text{bp} \;\Rightarrow\; \text{borrowing \$ via EUR costs SOFR} + 30\text{bp beyond parity} $$

Quarter-ends, year-ends and every dollar-funding squeeze print in this number; central-bank swap lines exist to cap it.

Who uses which basis

  • Bank ALM desks: match asset and liability indices across the book — the biggest structural users.
  • Issuers: a European company issuing dollar bonds swaps proceeds back via cross-currency basis — the basis level decides whether "cheap" dollar funding actually was.
  • Relative-value funds: trade basis mean-reversion around quarter-ends and policy shifts, warehousing what dealers won't.
Worked example: a Japanese insurer wants dollar credit yield. Dollar bonds at 5.2%, hedged back to yen through 3-month FX rolls: costs SOFR–call-it-5.3% plus a −55bp USD/JPY basis — hedged yield goes negative versus just buying JGBs. The entire "hedged foreign bond" allocation decision of a very large sector reduces to the basis print.
4 · AdvancedPricing & valuation

Multi-curve pricing: why basis broke the textbook

Pre-2008, one curve both projected forward rates and discounted cash flows. Non-zero basis makes that inconsistent: each index needs its own projection curve, calibrated jointly to vanilla swaps and basis swaps, while discounting follows the collateral rate (OIS for cleared trades):

$$ V = \sum_i \tau_i \, \big(F^{(1)}_i + b\big) \, D^{OIS}(t_i) - \sum_j \tau_j \, F^{(2)}_j \, D^{OIS}(t_j) $$
What the symbols mean
  • Va value
  • tautime remaining, in years
  • Fthe forward or futures price
  • Dduration: how far a bond's cash flows sit in the future
  • Sthe price of the underlying today
  • ta point in time

with forwards \(F^{(k)}\) each read off their own curve. The machinery — curve bootstrapping as a joint fit across swap, basis and FX-forward markets — is now the first chapter of every rates quant's job, and it exists because a "curiosity spread" went to 365.

What drives the cross-currency basis

  • CIP deviation as balance-sheet pricing: post-crisis leverage rules made arbitraging the basis capital-expensive; the basis is the rent on scarce dealer balance sheet (Du–Tepper–Verdelhan formalised it). It widens at reporting dates because balance sheet is scarcest exactly then — the "window dressing" sawtooth.
  • Structural flow imbalance: Japanese and European institutions structurally demand dollars (hedging US assets); US institutions don't symmetrically demand yen or euros. The sign of the basis is the sign of that queue.
  • Central-bank swap lines put a soft ceiling on funding stress: when the Fed's lines price through the basis, usage explodes (March 2020: $450bn) and the basis snaps back — the closest thing the offshore dollar system has to a lender of last resort, priced live.

Post-LIBOR residue

The RFR transition killed the tenor-basis complex (compounded SOFR has one flavour) but created new ones: term-SOFR vs compounded-SOFR basis (a one-way market regulators actively cap), Euribor's survival making EUR the last two-curve major, and legacy-fallback basis embedded in transitioned contracts. Basis never dies; it migrates to wherever two conventions coexist.

The formulas above are standard textbook formulations, simplified for teaching. They explain the mechanism — they are not a valuation tool, and they will not reproduce a dealer’s price.

5 · Desk notesHow practitioners think about it
Practitioner note: read basis spreads as the market's X-ray of the plumbing — LIBOR-OIS-style bases price bank credit, cross-currency bases price dollar scarcity, term-vs-compounded bases price convention risk. None of them price "interest rates"; all of them price the assumptions underneath.

Now say it back

Close the page and give Basis Swap in four sentences. It takes a minute and it is the only way to find out whether reading it was enough.

  1. Who wants what — two parties wanted opposite things badly enough to write it down.
  2. What the contract obliges, and when — not the payoff; the obligation.
  3. Where the money comes from — name the source, or you have described a hope.
  4. What makes it lose — the ordinary way, not the dramatic one.

Do it with a clock → · why these four

Put Basis Swap beside any other instrument →

Where this instrument shows up elsewhere

  • EasyThe Words of Your First WeekPrepThe vocabulary a trading floor uses without explaining it, grouped by the situation you will first hear each word in…
  • MediumThe Yield CurveConceptsOne line, drawn from overnight to 30 years — the bond market's forecast, the economy's mood ring, and a P&L engine…
  • MediumWhich Desk Trades WhatPrepEleven trading seats and six that sit next to them: what each one actually touches, the single number it lives by,…
  • HardRelative ValueIndustryTwo things that should cost the same and do not — a small difference, held in size, financed by somebody else

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer