Currency-Hedged vs. UnhedgedMedium

Hedging removes a risk and adds a cost, and which one dominates depends entirely on the asset. The answer is different for bonds and equities, and that is not a matter of opinion.

5 min read · 812 words · Updated

What hedging actually does

  • A hedged share class sells the foreign currency forward, usually monthly, in the amount of the fund's foreign exposure. When the currency moves, the forward contract offsets it.
  • The cost is the interest-rate differential, not a fee. Covered interest parity fixes it: hedging a currency whose rates are higher than yours costs you roughly that difference every year, and hedging a lower-rate currency pays you.
  • Plus the cross-currency basis, which is a real and sometimes large additional term — the hedged-yield calculator computes all of it.
  • It is not free and it is not a fee. It is the price of removing a risk, set by rate markets rather than by the fund provider.
$$ \text{hedge cost} \approx r_{\text{foreign}} - r_{\text{domestic}} - \text{basis} $$
What the symbols mean
  • rthe interest rate, per year

Bonds: hedging almost always makes sense

  • The reason is proportion. A foreign government bond might have 5% annual volatility; the currency has 8–10%. Unhedged, the currency is not a side effect — it is the majority of the risk, and it swamps the thing you bought the bond for.
  • The bond was bought for a known, modest return. Adding an unrelated risk twice its size defeats the purpose entirely.
  • The hedge cost is not a loss. It approximately equals the difference in short rates, which is roughly the difference in the two bond markets' yields. Hedging a high-yielding foreign bond back typically leaves you near your domestic yield — which is the point: you were not being offered free extra yield.
  • The pick-up, when it exists, comes from the basis and curve shape, not from the yield difference. It is real, it is measurable, and it is a fraction of the headline gap.

Equities: the case is genuinely open

ArgumentFor hedgingAgainst hedging
RiskRemoves an unrewarded volatility sourceCurrency risk is partly offset by the assets themselves
CostCost is small relative to equity volatilityCost is certain; the benefit is not
Correlation—Safe-haven currencies rise in crises, cushioning equity falls
Underlying—A global company's earnings are already multi-currency; the listing currency overstates the exposure
HorizonMatters over 1–5 yearsTends to wash out over decades
  • Equity volatility is 15–20%, currency 8–10%, and they are not perfectly correlated — so hedging removes proportionally much less of the total risk than it does for bonds.
  • The natural-hedge argument is real but weaker than claimed. A company's earnings currency and its share price's currency behaviour are related, not identical.
  • The reasonable conclusion: for equities this is a genuine judgement call with defensible answers on both sides, and anyone stating it as obvious in either direction has stopped reading early.

What a hedged share class does not do

  • It does not hedge continuously. Hedges are struck on a schedule, usually monthly, in the amount of the exposure at that moment. Between resets, market moves leave the hedge over- or under-sized.
  • It does not hedge the underlying revenue exposure — only the currency of the assets. A hedged fund of European shares still owns companies earning dollars.
  • It does not remove the cost when rates move against you. The cost is whatever the differential becomes, and it can change substantially within a year.
  • It does not come free of tracking noise. Hedged classes have a small additional tracking error from the reset mechanics, visible in the tracking difference.

The framing that resolves most of it

  • What currency are your liabilities in? If you will spend in euros, euro-denominated outcomes are what matter, and everything else is a translation risk you are choosing to hold.
  • What proportion of the position's risk is currency? Above roughly half — the bond case — hedging is close to a structural requirement. Well below — the equity case — it is a preference.
  • Can you tolerate the cost being certain and the benefit uncertain? That asymmetry is what makes people abandon hedges at the worst time.
  • Are you hedging or predicting? Hedging is removing an exposure. Choosing to hedge sometimes is a currency view, and should be labelled as one.

The checklist

  • Which risk dominates — check the asset's volatility against the currency's with the volatility converter.
  • What does the hedge cost at today's rate differential, and what if that differential doubles?
  • Is the share class hedged, or just denominated in your currency? These are different things with confusingly similar names, and only one of them hedges anything.
  • Does the ongoing charge differ between the hedged and unhedged classes?
  • Will you keep the hedge through the year in which it costs you visibly? A hedge abandoned mid-way is the worst of both.

Information and education only. This page explains hedging mechanics in general terms. It is not advice, not a recommendation for or against hedging any exposure, and the volatility figures used are illustrative ranges rather than measurements of any market.

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer