The UK LDI Crisis, 2022Hard

Pension funds hedged their risk correctly and still nearly failed — because being right at maturity does not pay a margin call on Wednesday.

3 min read · 620 words · Updated

What happened

  • Background — UK defined-benefit pension schemes owe payments decades out. To hedge the interest-rate risk of those liabilities they use leveraged gilt and swap positions, freeing capital for return-seeking assets. This is liability-driven investment, and it is sound in principle.
  • 23 September 2022 — the UK government announces large unfunded tax cuts. Gilt yields jump sharply; long-dated yields rise by around a hundred basis points within days.
  • Immediately — the hedges lose mark-to-market value and generate same-day variation margin calls. Funds sell gilts to raise the cash.
  • 26–28 September — that selling pushes yields higher, which triggers larger margin calls, which forces more selling. A textbook spiral.
  • 28 September — the Bank of England begins temporary long-dated gilt purchases explicitly for financial-stability reasons, ending the operation in mid-October.

The mechanism

Leverage compresses the distance between a market move and a forced exit. The hedge was correct; the liquidity to carry it was not there.
WipeoutMargin call3× leveredUnleveredUnderlying price moveEquity value

Point at a line to read what it is doing.

How do I read this chart?

The underlying's move runs across, the value of your own money up. Two straight lines with different slopes — and one of them stops, which is the only difference that matters.

Where this is explained properly:

The axes carry no scale on purpose. Every line here is a stylised shape drawn to show a mechanism, so there is no number to read off one — and any figure taken from it would be invented.

  • Variation margin is a liquidity demand, not a valuation. A position can be profitable at maturity and still require cash today (see margin & collateral).
  • The only sellable asset was the hedge's own underlying. Pension portfolios held gilts and illiquid private assets; raising cash quickly meant selling gilts — the very thing whose price was falling.
  • Everyone faced the same call at the same time, because the strategy was industry-standard. Crowding turned individually rational selling into a market-wide event.
  • No step was a mistake in isolation. Every action was contractually correct, which is what makes this a plumbing failure rather than a scandal.

What it teaches

  • Model the liquidity of your hedge, not just its correctness. The question is "can I fund the path?", not only "am I right at the end?"
  • Collateral waterfalls need pre-agreed, genuinely liquid buffers — sized for a move several times larger than the historical norm.
  • Leverage inside a "conservative" strategy is still leverage. The label describes the intention; the margin agreement describes the risk.
  • Central banks now treat market plumbing as a stability mandate — an intervention aimed at a spiral, not at the level of rates.

The mechanisms behind this

Every case on this site is an instrument or a mechanism doing exactly what it was built to do, in a situation nobody had pictured. These are the pages that explain the machinery:

Information and education only. This is a simplified summary of publicly reported events, written for teaching purposes. It compresses a complex episode, omits material detail, and does not characterise the conduct or motives of any person or organisation. It is not advice, not a forecast, and not a recommendation about any market, instrument or institution.

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer