The UK LDI Crisis, 2022Hard
Pension funds hedged their risk correctly and still nearly failed — because being right at maturity does not pay a margin call on Wednesday.
3 min read · 620 words · Updated
What happened
- Background — UK defined-benefit pension schemes owe payments decades out. To hedge the interest-rate risk of those liabilities they use leveraged gilt and swap positions, freeing capital for return-seeking assets. This is liability-driven investment, and it is sound in principle.
- 23 September 2022 — the UK government announces large unfunded tax cuts. Gilt yields jump sharply; long-dated yields rise by around a hundred basis points within days.
- Immediately — the hedges lose mark-to-market value and generate same-day variation margin calls. Funds sell gilts to raise the cash.
- 26–28 September — that selling pushes yields higher, which triggers larger margin calls, which forces more selling. A textbook spiral.
- 28 September — the Bank of England begins temporary long-dated gilt purchases explicitly for financial-stability reasons, ending the operation in mid-October.
The mechanism
Point at a line to read what it is doing.
How do I read this chart?
The underlying's move runs across, the value of your own money up. Two straight lines with different slopes — and one of them stops, which is the only difference that matters.
Where this is explained properly:
The axes carry no scale on purpose. Every line here is a stylised shape drawn to show a mechanism, so there is no number to read off one — and any figure taken from it would be invented.
- Variation margin is a liquidity demand, not a valuation. A position can be profitable at maturity and still require cash today (see margin & collateral).
- The only sellable asset was the hedge's own underlying. Pension portfolios held gilts and illiquid private assets; raising cash quickly meant selling gilts — the very thing whose price was falling.
- Everyone faced the same call at the same time, because the strategy was industry-standard. Crowding turned individually rational selling into a market-wide event.
- No step was a mistake in isolation. Every action was contractually correct, which is what makes this a plumbing failure rather than a scandal.
What it teaches
- Model the liquidity of your hedge, not just its correctness. The question is "can I fund the path?", not only "am I right at the end?"
- Collateral waterfalls need pre-agreed, genuinely liquid buffers — sized for a move several times larger than the historical norm.
- Leverage inside a "conservative" strategy is still leverage. The label describes the intention; the margin agreement describes the risk.
- Central banks now treat market plumbing as a stability mandate — an intervention aimed at a spiral, not at the level of rates.
The mechanisms behind this
Every case on this site is an instrument or a mechanism doing exactly what it was built to do, in a situation nobody had pictured. These are the pages that explain the machinery:
- Interest rate swaps — the hedge itself, and why it is right at maturity and expensive on Wednesday.
- Margin & collateral — variation margin is a liquidity demand, not a valuation.
- Government bonds — the only sellable asset, sold into the fall it was hedging against.
- What liquidity costs and what it pays — the cost of being a forced seller of the thing you were right about.
Information and education only. This is a simplified summary of publicly reported events, written for teaching purposes. It compresses a complex episode, omits material detail, and does not characterise the conduct or motives of any person or organisation. It is not advice, not a forecast, and not a recommendation about any market, instrument or institution.
More in Case Studies
- HardThe Greek restructuring, 2012A sovereign bond exchange in which the terms of existing bonds were changed by law, and the derivative that was…
- HardThe Uptier Transactions, 2020 onwardA majority of lenders amended their own credit agreement to move themselves in front of the minority — using…
- HardArgentina and the Holdouts, 2001–2016A sovereign default, two exchanges accepted by most holders, and a minority that refused — and won, because one…
- MediumWoodford, 2019A daily-dealing fund holding things that took months to sell