AOL Time Warner, 2000Easy

In short

The largest merger ever announced at the time, paid for in shares that were themselves the thing being valued — and written down two years later.

3 min read · 521 words · Updated

What happened

  • January 2000 — an internet service provider and a media group announce a share-for-share merger. The internet company's shareholders are to hold the larger share of the combined group.
  • The consideration is shares, so nothing is fixed in cash: what the media group's holders receive depends entirely on what the buyer's shares are worth when it closes and afterwards.
  • Through 2000 and 2001 — the sector's share prices fall broadly. The transaction completes in January 2001.
  • 2002 — the combined company records goodwill impairments of around $99 billion for the year, at the time the largest annual loss reported by a US company.
  • 2009 — the two businesses are separated again.

The mechanism

  • A share deal fixes a ratio, not a price. The premium quoted on announcement day is a statement about one moment; see the exchange ratio for why it moves every day afterwards.
  • Goodwill is the arithmetic of the price paid. It is what the consideration exceeded the identifiable net assets — so a high price recorded in shares creates a large balance-sheet item that later has to be tested.
  • An impairment is not a cash event. It restates a number that was created at closing; the cash was never paid, because the currency was equity.
  • The synergy case has to clear the premium. The calculator on the M&A desk shows what annual synergies a premium requires — and what happens when they do not arrive.
  • Nothing in the sequence needed a villain. A ratio agreed at one set of prices, an accounting standard applied as written, and a sector that repriced.

What it teaches

  • Ask what currency is being used before asking what price is being paid. Cash transfers value; shares transfer a share of the outcome, including the buyer's own repricing.
  • Read the contribution analysis, not the premium. What each side brings in earnings and cash flow against what it will own is the check a dissenting holder does first.
  • A collar is the mechanism that would have bounded it — and negotiating one is a statement about which side expects the ratio to move.
  • Goodwill is a promise recorded as an asset. Its size is a measure of how much of the case rests on things that were not on the balance sheet.

The mechanisms behind this

Every case on this site is an instrument or a mechanism doing exactly what it was built to do, in a situation nobody had pictured. These are the pages that explain the machinery:

Information and education only. This is a simplified summary of publicly reported events, written for teaching purposes. It compresses a complex episode, omits material detail, and does not characterise the conduct or motives of any person or organisation. It is not advice, not a forecast, and not a recommendation about any market, instrument or institution.

Information and education only. Every page, figure and calculator on this site exists to explain how financial instruments work. Nothing here is investment, tax or legal advice, a recommendation, or a valuation you can rely on. Full disclaimer